I followed this blog for some time, as I believe Russia-gate and its toxic after effects have done serious and long-term damage to our democracy, or former democracy (?). I know you have worked hard to get certain facts and expose them. That said, I find much of what you write inscrutable. I’ve followed this conspiracy closely and try to keep up with recent developments, but I can never seem to understand the relevance of the attribution analysis, DARPA contracts, etc.
Perhaps if you could just explain your theory of the case and how the evidence you’ve collected supports that case it would begin to make sense. Sorry to say this, but after all your hard work I am still lost deep in the weeds of what you are trying to establish regarding the Russia-gate hoax.
UF smoked out Ga Tech researchers contributed to Alfa Bank hoax using developmental Alpha tech that was being sold to DARPA. That’s three strikes against the integrity of anyone who stakes out the arena of enhanced threat attribution as their own. Later, UF smoked out that Mueller brought in Ga Tech. Why? WTF? UF is hyper skeptical of the Guccifer 2 narrative that grounds RussiaGate. If, he succeeds in knocking the above narrative over, the ICA, Mueller, FBI, RussiaGate goes up in smoke. Right or wrong… it’s fun to watch and I pay for the privilege.
I followed this blog for some time, as I believe Russia-gate and its toxic after effects have done serious and long-term damage to our democracy, or former democracy (?). I know you have worked hard to get certain facts and expose them. That said, I find much of what you write inscrutable. I’ve followed this conspiracy closely and try to keep up with recent developments, but I can never seem to understand the relevance of the attribution analysis, DARPA contracts, etc.
Perhaps if you could just explain your theory of the case and how the evidence you’ve collected supports that case it would begin to make sense. Sorry to say this, but after all your hard work I am still lost deep in the weeds of what you are trying to establish regarding the Russia-gate hoax.
Perhaps the best approach is to read this document. https://www.securityweek.com/dnc-hacker-indictment-lesson-failed-misattribution/
UF smoked out Ga Tech researchers contributed to Alfa Bank hoax using developmental Alpha tech that was being sold to DARPA. That’s three strikes against the integrity of anyone who stakes out the arena of enhanced threat attribution as their own. Later, UF smoked out that Mueller brought in Ga Tech. Why? WTF? UF is hyper skeptical of the Guccifer 2 narrative that grounds RussiaGate. If, he succeeds in knocking the above narrative over, the ICA, Mueller, FBI, RussiaGate goes up in smoke. Right or wrong… it’s fun to watch and I pay for the privilege.