Back to NCIJTF
Last night I realized I left something important out of my links post. Last year we obtained DARPA’s Angelos Keromytis’ detailee agreement with the FBI’s National Cyber Investigative Task Force (NCIJTF).
We were reminded of this after re-reading a congressional letter from July 26, 2016 asking for a briefing on NCIJTF’s efforts on the DNC hack.
In a string of posts we have alluded to this, but it could have ramifications for why Antonakakis and Dagon did a series of attribution analyses on the DNC hack and suggested that DARPA had tasked them, which DARPA has denied. If a DARPA contractor (Angelos Keromytis) detailed to NCIJTF tasked them, everything makes more sense, as the agreement specifies Keromytis couldn’t inform DARPA of his work for the FBI.
We also have the memorandums of understanding between DARPA and NSD-DOJ and NCIJTF.
We’ve also previously established the Keromytis connection to Heather Alpino.
We need someone in the government to take a hard look at this and any work that went to Mueller.
Sen Grassley is amazing at oversight. Neat letter. I noticed in that congressional letter that prior campaigns had been looked at by a reporter. Interesting that she is the reporter that broke the December 9 CIA story and also the DNC hack story.
Footnote 7
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-intelligence-director-hackers-have-tried-to-spy-on-2016-presidential-campaigns/2016/05/18/2b1745c0-1d0d-11e6-b6e0-c53b7ef63b45_story.html
I followed this blog for some time, as I believe Russia-gate and its toxic after effects have done serious and long-term damage to our democracy, or former democracy (?). I know you have worked hard to get certain facts and expose them. That said, I find much of what you write inscrutable. I’ve followed this conspiracy closely and try to keep up with recent developments, but I can never seem to understand the relevance of the attribution analysis, DARPA contracts, etc.
Perhaps if you could just explain your theory of the case and how the evidence you’ve collected supports that case it would begin to make sense. Sorry to say this, but after all your hard work I am still lost deep in the weeds of what you are trying to establish regarding the Russia-gate hoax.