Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bestoink's avatar

I take your point. Still, we’ve entered a fresh, new recreational phase of Russiagate. So, there’s that.

Expand full comment
Kelly Green's avatar

Let's face reality. One, we knew most of this long ago. We even knew about this meeting (Susan Rice had the meeting in her notes). But we didn't have documented evidence that the actual pros in the IC were saying something different before the meeting kicked this effort off, and we didn't have evidence that Obama may have directed this somewhat. Those are good things to learn.

But, people officially at the head of an agency stopping a report and redirecting it to say what they want it to say is not going to end in repercussions or jail time. It's done all the time in non-sinister ways and it's quite simply properly within their power.

It's just a loss of face, and as such we're talking about one more straw moving more people to the side of seeing the realities of Russiagate. Maybe this takes us from 55% of people getting it to 57-58% of people getting it.

I agree that people should temper their excitement here. No comeuppance coming.

Expand full comment
7 more comments...

No posts