Georgia Tech Doc Review - Part Three
Tonight, we’ll get back to business and take another look at some of our documents from last year. Today I got a new batch of 191 pages that I haven’t looked through yet from DARPA that appears to detail meetings, and more documents will continue to be produced over the next few weeks. I remain optimistic that the GOP Congress will jump into this with subpoenas soon.
This one has always stuck with me for how remarkably disconnected the leadership at Georgia Tech seems to be from the truth:
“Strictly non-partisan” and a “focus on data” are just mind blowing statements when you consider the narrative of the communications channel is completely non-technical and the fact that they were hunting for dirt on Trump speaks to their motivations.
Next, we have an open question as to why Durham was interested in international travel. Was he just dotting his i’s, or was there a larger theory?
Here is something that is a bit troubling:
DeFilippis thinks Georgia Tech can’t find any records on July 29th, but later that same day, Kate Wasch of Georgia Tech is saying they haven’t even attempted any searches of the servers in the lab:
I’m also not a big fan of the reliance on Antonakakis and Dagon to tell Georgia Tech where to search for records:
Next, we see a letter from Alfa Bank’s attorneys where apparently Dagon is asserting his 5th amendment rights not to comply owing to the criminal liability he faces from Durham, but he had already been immunized by that point:
Is that the essence of being “cooperative” as the leadership of Georgia Tech suggested?
Not sure of the ethical standards of being a lawyer, but I would have some concerns about representing something to a 3rd party that you know is false:
More to come.