For those that have followed, it’s been a long journey. I’ve launched 4 lawsuits against the federal government, and last year filed an action in the DC courts seeking public disclosure of certain grand jury materials (major newspapers have tried some similar actions to varying degrees of success), and those actions brought me into contact with several officials of the DOJ.
They’ve done well in arguing their points without giving up the game.
My initial contacts in the DC action were with officials of the Cyber Section of the National Security Division - the same officials responsible for the Netyksho prosecution now that SCO Mueller is gone.
In response to that filing, which flagged the role of the Clinton-Connected Alfa Bank cyber researchers in the DNC hack investigation, there was a comment in seeking a delay to respond that cited the complexity of the factual matters. Now, it’s easy to read too much into that.
But it’s how it was said that caught my attention. I did everything but call the Department of Justice co-conspirators and they didn’t say - hey, you’re wrong. They said it’s complicated.
If we are half as successful in the next 6 months as I expect to be, those officials in the cyber section will have to answer questions on what they did when I submitted my filing and if and why they did or didn’t see the issue.
In a perfect world, legal standing wouldn’t be an issue to go into a court case and tell the Judge that the government’s case is bullshit. The indicted Russians are hackers, and they may be guilty of numerous crimes against the United States but it doesn’t take a genius to figure out that they didn’t do the DNC hack.
I’m going to initiate some coverage on the DOJ’s lawsuit against Georgia Tech, and hopefully share some new documents this week.
Thank you
You be gettin’ warm.