Quick note before today’s writeup, last week I started getting productions on my FOIA’s on my second federal lawsuit [191 pages so far] but nothing earth shattering yet, they gave me the easy stuff first. More is expected soon.
I remain strongly of the opinion that the DNC hack was a false flag operation. Every other piece of Russiagate has been debunked as fraud.
What are the odds that Clinton operatives were fabricating evidence about Russian efforts at the same time the Russians were really doing something as big as a hack?
We’ve talked about our concerns with the hack attribution, the too-convenient timing of Guccifer 2.0 appearing, and raised our concerns about the inexplicable delay in providing the FBI images of the compromised systems. In fact, they hadn’t even done the imaging by October 2016 despite remediating the system in June. I don’t have the technical expertise to speculate on what happens when you do the imaging post-remediation, but I don’t accept that it isn’t standard operating procedure to image the systems as or before you remediate it. There was a lot at stake, they were accusing Russia of hacking a major political party!
Look at everything they had done in Crossfire Hurricane without any evidence on the hack.
A thought hit me earlier today that prompted this post re-treading on our familiar ground.
In the context of the evolving debunking of Russian twitter bots as a Democrat operation (known as Project Birmingham), it’s notable that Democrat operatives used Cyrillic characters as their red herring:
All of a sudden, there are a bunch of Russian accounts the Democrats created.
And just as the House GOP was forcing Fusion GPS to reveal Clinton paid for the dossier.
It reminded me of the Russian language settings and Cyrillic characters used throughout the DNC hack and document dissemination, sloppily dismissed by left wing “journalists” as carelessness by authentic Russian hackers.
What kind of government would create an influence campaign filled with bot accounts using Cyrillic characters throughout the profiles? No plausible deniability. Does that does like a intelligence operation?
And yet, thats what the Democrats wanted us to believe. They thought we were so stupid that we could believe Russia would create thousands of bot accounts using Russian names and language.
They make the same argument over all the discrepancies around the DNC hack.
Lets hope the House GOP steps up with subpoenas and pursues these questions. Given the scale of embarassment for the United States to admit this was all a partisan ruse, it’s not going to be an easy test to pass.
Having looked at this for as long as I have, I really have no doubts anymore this was all a political scheme by Hillary Clinton and at some point, President Obama became a part of it. Perhaps reluctantly.
I’m happy to be wrong. I’ll be the first to say I’m wrong and eat crow and denounce the Russians forever.
I would be happier to be wrong than to be right.
Every day we discover more & keep adding to the factual timeline. When you read through the timeline again with an enhanced perspective more of the truth is revealed. While the Potemkin lies are repeated ad nauseum by the 'interagency' they ring more & more hollow. This is the awareness stage when the narrative is undermined with the truth. Accountability next when there is sufficient weight in the Court of Public opinion on the Truth. Keep digging & revealing! thank you for your work.
Make sure you get creative and try to out sly them with your foia requests ala
their c-o-r-n-e-y instead of comey spellings
I'm sure you've already thought of that but these are tricky bastards