CIA Report & More

Yesterday John Ratcliffe released a new 8 page CIA analysis of their 2016/17 Intelligence Community Assessment.

There is nothing truly new in that analysis, but it did provide a little color on a few pieces. The analysis found that the major outlets (NYT/WaPo) were reporting a conclusion of the intelligence community before their work had even begun, based on anonymous leaks.

We already knew the Steele dossier was a component of the ICA, but the new analysis states the FBI would have refused to participate in the ICA if the dossier wasn’t concluded, and then working to include references to the Steele dossier throughout the main body of the ICA.

Nothing else about the analysis is particularly interesting to us. Check out Miranda Devine’s article here.

It’s worth noting that HPSCI drafted a report approximately 7 years ago on the ICA which has remained classified.

We’ve previously noted our own sources have stated Obama ordered the ICA to support an interference/collusion narrative and to exclude any evidence that did not support that conclusion.

It’s curious the CIA chose this path instead of leaning into the Clinton Plan Intelligence. Although it invokes sensitive materials gathered by the Dutch, it would be far more informative on what happened.

---

A few weeks ago Kash Patel was on Joe Rogan and had some interesting comments if you want to check that out. Kash detailed a room of hidden documents from the “Comey” era, and on Russiagate stated they were reviewed some of the facts with an eye towards a conspiracy case.

On that point, finding overt acts to extend the statute of limitations is fairly easy. A conspiracy doesn’t require every party to be fully read in on the plan, or to even be aware of other components.

Even something like Christopher Steele’s 2021 interview with ABCNews could be considered an overt act.

The only issue arises in linking actors of the FBI/DOJ, Obama administration, to the Clinton operatives. For some reason, nobody wants to see the big picture.

Our take is that there are too many cooks in the kitchen. Too many ideas on what Russiagate is or who was behind it, and subsequently nothing is getting done. There is clearly a viable conspiracy case, but where is Congress on this? Where is the transparency?

James Comey and others refused to re-up their security clearances and have never been asked the hard questions. Ideally Trump would declassify everything and pierce that veil of protection with Congress following closely behind with subpoenas for testimony.

They could dump all the Crowdstrike reports out there, the HPSCI-ICA report, all of Mueller’s emails and documents on the Netyksho case, etc., and the sleuths would rip them apart within hours.

It’s been 3 years since we established the DARPA-DOJ connection and memorandum of understanding. We also established a link between the Alfa Bank cyber researchers and the Mueller investigation and DNC hack attribution.

The months are ticking by and everyone in Washington DC seems oblivious to it. The DNC hack was spoofed, and the entirety of the public narrative on Russian interference is nothing but fraud orchestrated at the highest levels of our government.

Last point, I want to apologize for the silent treatment. I’ve been working on writing a book which will cover our development, our finds, our lawsuits, and much of the behind the scenes stuff. It’s been quite a journey.